This is why I was shocked to see such a large number of "no" voting. There was a report earlier this week that some players were looking to change their vote and the Madden 23 coins Players Association rejected their request. However, it was thought that the majority of those players wanted to alter the way they vote, by changing it from "no" towards "yes," once they had more information about the CBA. The majority of players were"iMadden" NFL affected by the opinions on social media, and I'm sure that once they started to read the CBA for themselves, they wanted to alter their vote.
Then again, according to Benjamin Allbright, it wouldn't have been a big deal:
Re: Madden NFL 23 CBAI'm told the number of players who asked to change their vote was in the teens and "wouldn't affect" what was the end tally.Far more concerning was the fact that 20% of voters eligible did not cast a vote.
The biggest leverage that players have in this situation is the chance of being forced to sit out games. I'm the only person with a unique view of this, being part of the 2011 lockout and CBA negotiations. Players swore they'd be able to keep their promise for the duration of a season. But, when they started to savor the start of the training camp, they gave in. Players were desperate for money. They'd taken out high-interest loans or were running out of cash when the season was getting closer. They wanted to get a bargain, and that would mean settling for less.
While you may think that Madden NFL 23PA had been encouraging players for several years to save money in case there was an unexpected strike, remember the words I used to describe: a majority of the Madden NFL 23 players are the rank-and-file. They are NOT prepared to face a strike. They've never gotten their funds back, and that could be because they're younger and/or can't. Some veterans who play on the big stage aren't prepared for this. This is a constant concern in these talks.
No one is ever completely satisfied with a labor agreement during any negotiation you're bound to make concessions and get a little. But, I'd supported this CBA although I'm aware of the limitations.
The owners' money is what they care about. They aren't concerned about less practice time or less testing for street drug use, which is the reason they were willing to surrender these points. They didn't receive enough in exchange for a 17th game, however.
They needed a larger revenue split of 48.5 percent. They required an extra bye week for an extra match. They required more roster slots as well as a greater increase of the active roster for games as opposed to what they received.
There's controversy over the quality of the benefits that are offered to every retired player. Some say it's enough, at least for the moment, as Carl Eller, president of the cheap madden nfl 23 coins Retired Players Association is doing here.